Political Prices and Institutional Obstacles in Maffeo Pantaleoni

Nicolò Bellanca

History of Economic Thought and Policy2025https://doi.org/10.3280/spe2025-001005article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Maffeo Pantaleoni's concepts of political prices and economic prices explore institutional change and the dynamics of rent-seeking society. He distinguishes between objective discriminations, which conform to the reproductive logic of an institution, and those that are entirely arbitrary. Additionally, he distinguishes between criteria of impartiality, which treat everyone the same way, and criteria of universalizability, which apply a rule regardless of whom it may benefit or harm. Through these concepts, he defines economic prices as characterized by proscriptive rules, which prohibit certain choices, rather than prescriptive rules, which allow certain options for some and not for others. They cannot eliminate privileges, but they eliminate privileged access to privileges. Their antithesis is political prices, which emerge when groups compete with each other to grab rents and maintain privileges. The more the system of political prices generalizes across all institutions (private, public, commercial) of society, the less it can sustain itself, as every group desires to benefit from it, but no one wants to finance it. Here lies the historical resilience of economic prices.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3280/spe2025-001005

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nicolò2025,
  title        = {{Political Prices and Institutional Obstacles in Maffeo Pantaleoni}},
  author       = {Nicolò Bellanca},
  journal      = {History of Economic Thought and Policy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3280/spe2025-001005},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Political Prices and Institutional Obstacles in Maffeo Pantaleoni

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.