The US Trade Deficit: Myths and Realities

Maurice Obstfeld

Brookings Papers on Economic Activity2025https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2025.a978548article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

ABSTRACT: A policy priority of the US government is to reduce America's long-standing trade deficit. Economic planners in the Trump administration blame the postwar world trading system for harming the US economy and hope to change it through wide-ranging tariffs and other measures. Three prominent myths underlie the narrative that the United States has been victimized by trade partners. The first holds that trade liberalization that has left the United States open to mercantilist foreign practices is a primary cause of the aggregate US trade deficit. The second is that the dollar's status as the premier international reserve currency obliges the United States to run trade deficits to supply foreign official holders with dollars. The third is that US deficits are caused entirely by foreign financial inflows that America must accommodate by consuming more than it produces. This paper shows that the realities are more nuanced. While foreign and domestic trade policies can affect both imports and exports separately, they are not principal drivers of their difference, the trade deficit. The United States can supply the world with dollars without trade deficits. Finally, the trade deficit reflects the interplay of foreign and US macroeconomic factors (including China's saving rate and the US government budget deficit) and often US factors are dominant. Higher federal fiscal deficits, for example, will raise US trade deficits despite more import tariffs.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2025.a978548

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{maurice2025,
  title        = {{The US Trade Deficit: Myths and Realities}},
  author       = {Maurice Obstfeld},
  journal      = {Brookings Papers on Economic Activity},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2025.a978548},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The US Trade Deficit: Myths and Realities

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.