arbiter
JournalsAccount

Navigating the intersection of innovation and tradition: Electronic signatures in US election codes

Aashish Srivastava

Common Law World Review2025https://doi.org/10.1177/14737795251343904article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Electronic signatures have revolutionised the way agreements are executed, offering increased convenience and efficiency in various industries. However, their integration into US state election codes remains a point of contention. While legal frameworks such as the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) and the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-SIGN) support the legitimacy of electronic signatures, equating them with traditional handwritten ones, many state laws impose exceptions or additional requirements specific to election codes. These challenges arise from the need to balance technological progress with the integrity and trust that handwritten signatures have historically symbolised in electoral processes. This article delves into these issues, analysing key court cases that address the tension between embracing innovation and preserving the principles of election security and authenticity. It highlights the role of judicial decisions in shaping the legal landscape for electronic signatures in voting. Ultimately, the article concludes by reaffirming the significance of UETA in legitimising electronic signatures, while acknowledging the enduring role of handwritten signatures as a trusted and symbolic safeguard of democratic processes.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14737795251343904

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{aashish2025,
  title        = {{Navigating the intersection of innovation and tradition: Electronic signatures in US election codes}},
  author       = {Aashish Srivastava},
  journal      = {Common Law World Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14737795251343904},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Navigating the intersection of innovation and tradition: Electronic signatures in US election codes

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.