W. H. Hutt on Keynesianism and the microfoundations of monetary theory

Lawrence H. White

The Review of Austrian Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-025-00720-3article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

In his book Keynesianism: Retrospect and Prospect (1963), followed by a revised and expanded version The Keynesian Episode: A Reassessment (1979), W. H. Hutt spelled out a version of “classical” macroeconomics ahead of its time. He cogently criticized the then-dominant Keynesian paradigm for its inconsistency with standard Marshallian price theory and monetary theory. He argued that unemployment is a symptom of mispricing of labor, and used Say’s Law to explain how such mispricing (not deficiency of aggregate demand) generates a recession in output. He opposed the Keynesian case (and, less persuasively, Leland Yeager’s monetarist case) for monetary expansion in a recession, arguing that market forces—if allowed to work unimpeded—will correct such mispricing and restore output, whereas monetary expansion will erode the purchasing power of money without permanently correcting the mispricing of labor.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-025-00720-3

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lawrence2026,
  title        = {{W. H. Hutt on Keynesianism and the microfoundations of monetary theory}},
  author       = {Lawrence H. White},
  journal      = {The Review of Austrian Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-025-00720-3},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

W. H. Hutt on Keynesianism and the microfoundations of monetary theory

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.