arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Diversification effects of ESG penalties in sustainable mean–variance portfolios

Lukas Müller

The Journal of Asset Management2026https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-026-00446-2article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We study how different ways of incorporating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) objectives into mean–variance portfolio choice affect diversification. A commonly used linear ESG adjustment tilts portfolios toward high-scoring assets but, under standard long-only constraints, systematically increases concentration as the impact of the ESG adjustment intensifies. We contrast this specification with a nonlinear ESG adjustment arising from a robust mean–variance framework, in which ESG characteristics shape uncertainty about expected returns. This approach tends to preserve diversification while still producing meaningful ESG tilts. Analytical results and numerical illustrations show that modeling choices for ESG adjustments are crucial for stable and well-diversified portfolio construction. Our findings have implications for practical ESG portfolio construction, while being derived from a stylized mean–variance setting.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-026-00446-2

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lukas2026,
  title        = {{Diversification effects of ESG penalties in sustainable mean–variance portfolios}},
  author       = {Lukas Müller},
  journal      = {The Journal of Asset Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-026-00446-2},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Diversification effects of ESG penalties in sustainable mean–variance portfolios

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.