Consequences of a Mismatch: Remedial Philosophy and Statutory Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act

Rita Trivedi

Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations2023https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-618620230000027003book-chapter
AJG 1
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) creates rights for covered employees, defines conduct that violates those rights, and deems that conduct an unfair labor practice. But while given broad remedial powers under the Act, the Board's options were curtailed by the Supreme Court's limit on the use of deterrence as an express remedial justification. The Board was left with a strongly make-whole, i.e., ex-post, focus to undo the consequences of a violation. Put differently, the current NLRA remedies reflect a pay-or-play philosophy. The goal is restoration after the fact, using ex-post remedies to give parties the benefit or status quo that they expected. An actor willing to pay may use a cost–benefit analysis and strategically choose to violate the Act, accepting the make-whole remedies later. But the Act created ex-ante statutory rights, not agreed-upon contractual terms. By statutory enactment, employees are given something of value deemed worthy of protection. Assigning value to compliance with the law in the first instance not only prevents sometimes irreparable harm but also reaffirms the inherent value of the right itself. The impact of the Board's limited remedies is therefore a broad value-driven one. Without ex-ante deterrence, the available ex-post make-whole remedial options make a normative statement about individuals' rights under the Act: those rights may not be inherently worth enough to incentivize legal compliance. The make-whole focus can imply that financial compensation for the portion of harm that can be calculated and “undoing” some nonfinancial effects is sufficient. There is little drive to deter infringement before the fact. By examining the remedial philosophy behind contrasting approaches in the common law of torts and contract, this Article asserts that the current remedial strictures and framework undermine both the Act and the worth of its rights in the eyes of the public and the employees who hold them.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-618620230000027003

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{rita2023,
  title        = {{Consequences of a Mismatch: Remedial Philosophy and Statutory Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act}},
  author       = {Rita Trivedi},
  journal      = {Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-618620230000027003},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Consequences of a Mismatch: Remedial Philosophy and Statutory Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.