arbiter
JournalsAccount

Reconciling Divergence Among ESG Scores: A Bi-level Artificial Intelligence Based Methodology for Corporate Governance Controversies Prediction

Boutheina Jlifi et al.

Computational Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-025-11260-0article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

No abstract available.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-025-11260-0

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{boutheina2026,
  title        = {{Reconciling Divergence Among ESG Scores: A Bi-level Artificial Intelligence Based Methodology for Corporate Governance Controversies Prediction}},
  author       = {Boutheina Jlifi et al.},
  journal      = {Computational Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-025-11260-0},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Reconciling Divergence Among ESG Scores: A Bi-level Artificial Intelligence Based Methodology for Corporate Governance Controversies Prediction

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.