‘We’re all in it together’: Student perspectives on compassionate pedagogy in higher education

Amy Tomlinson & Clare Killingback

Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice2026https://doi.org/10.53761/4kgdz121article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The value of compassion in promoting student wellbeing is being increasingly recognised by higher education institutions. Integrating compassion within pedagogic practice to develop a compassionate learning environment is important for wider student benefit. This qualitative study explores healthcare student perspectives and experiences regarding compassionate pedagogy. Four activity-oriented focus groups were conducted with undergraduate students. Thematic analysis identified five themes: connection, recognising the student as a whole person, cultivating compassion together, physical environment, and processes and systems. Findings suggest that students view compassion as extending far beyond classroom activities. They see it as a reciprocal process involving all individuals within an institution, requiring a change in institutional culture that prioritises students and staff as whole people. The insights provided by the students in this study are important in shaping a more compassionate higher education environment that minimises distress and maximises flourishing. Recommendations to enhance compassionate pedagogy are provided.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53761/4kgdz121

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{amy2026,
  title        = {{‘We’re all in it together’: Student perspectives on compassionate pedagogy in higher education}},
  author       = {Amy Tomlinson & Clare Killingback},
  journal      = {Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53761/4kgdz121},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

‘We’re all in it together’: Student perspectives on compassionate pedagogy in higher education

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.