Breaking Down Inequality: Can Taxes Really be Redistributive?

Lucas Menescal

Public Finance Review2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421261417427article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study examines the redistributive effects of tax system compositions across 107 countries from 1990 to 2020, using multiple econometric techniques and robustness checks to assess both short- and long-term dynamics. By stratifying countries by income levels and incorporating measures of tax effort, progressivity, and inequality quartiles, the analysis provides a detailed view of fiscal redistribution. Results show strong temporal persistence and relative support for the median voter hypothesis in high- and middle-income economies. Economic growth and informality negatively affect redistribution, while unemployment has income-specific impacts. Tax structure is central: PIT and SSC are most effective in high- and middle-income countries, while CIT and indirect taxes dominate in low-income economies. Structural progressivity enhances redistribution across all groups, and tax effort is particularly impactful in low-income countries. These findings highlight the importance of appropriate tax policy and fiscal capacity in achieving sustained redistribution.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421261417427

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lucas2026,
  title        = {{Breaking Down Inequality: Can Taxes Really be Redistributive?}},
  author       = {Lucas Menescal},
  journal      = {Public Finance Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421261417427},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Breaking Down Inequality: Can Taxes Really be Redistributive?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.