Gender diversity, governance innovation, and sustainable corporate practices: Evidence from the two-tier board system

Arif Budi Satrio

Innovation and Green Development2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2026.100331article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Corporate governance in emerging markets is often shaped by ownership concentration, which makes female board representation crucial. However, evidence of the role of women on boards remains limited and fragmented. This study investigates the role of female board members by using indicators of their representation, education, age, and nationality to examine how they influence corporate governance. Drawing on agency and resource dependence theories, this study examines the role of directors and commissioners in capturing the unique two-tier board systems in developing countries. Employing fixed effects and dynamic GMM, this study finds that board diversity improves governance quality, with the impact becoming more pronounced when it reaches a critical mass of 30 %. Younger, more highly educated, and foreign females on boards show differential interaction effects on boards of directors and commissioners, underscoring the importance of the quality of gender diversity tailored to their positions. This robust study advances the theory in a two-tier governance structure while offering practical guidance for regulators and firms to encourage meaningful female participation.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2026.100331

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{arif2026,
  title        = {{Gender diversity, governance innovation, and sustainable corporate practices: Evidence from the two-tier board system}},
  author       = {Arif Budi Satrio},
  journal      = {Innovation and Green Development},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2026.100331},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Gender diversity, governance innovation, and sustainable corporate practices: Evidence from the two-tier board system

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.