The Circumstantiality of Bivariate Relationships in <i>The Theory of Moral Sentiments</i>

Daniel B. Klein

Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology2023https://doi.org/10.1108/s0743-41542023000041a005book-chapter
ABDC C
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

In Theory of Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith reasons about how a change in one thing, A, is attended by a change in another thing, B. In expounding on such bivariate relationships, Smith sometimes seems to go out of his way to posit a state of the world in which the relationship would break down. That feature suggests an irony about knowing how a change in B attends a change in A. We might think we understand the bivariate relationship, but it holds only for certain states of the world. The relationship is circumstanced. The more one studies the Moral Sentiments, the more one realizes that circumstantiality suffuses its teachings. My discussion arrives at a place of doubt about the most important bivariate relationship – that between approval from our conscience and doing good. Smith seems to suggest, particularly at the end of his life, that a person can best know the relationship between his conscience’s approval and his doing good under circumstances of his having frank and open friendships. The implication for politics is that we want that kind of government that best conduces to frank and open friendships.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0743-41542023000041a005

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{daniel2023,
  title        = {{The Circumstantiality of Bivariate Relationships in <i>The Theory of Moral Sentiments</i>}},
  author       = {Daniel B. Klein},
  journal      = {Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0743-41542023000041a005},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Circumstantiality of Bivariate Relationships in <i>The Theory of Moral Sentiments</i>

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.