“Trying to Get Out from under Water”: Paradox and Power in the Audit Senior Associate Role

Emily Blum & Kris Hoang

The Accounting Review2026https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2022-0532article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Audit senior associates are essential to audit production, yet we know little about how they experience their organizational role. We interview 45 U.S.-based audit seniors and find they experience persistent paradoxical tensions between contradictory yet interrelated objectives, stemming from their middle hierarchical position as both experienced associates and novice executives. Applying Paradox Theory, we find seniors sometimes work around paradox by attending to one paradoxical objective to temporarily alleviate tension but leave the other paradoxical objective neglected. Other times, seniors work through paradox by dynamically engaging with both paradoxical objectives, particularly when empowered by perceiving adequate resources—time, information, and social capital. Our study reconceptualizes seniors as self-directed fledgling leaders whose capabilities are forged through navigating paradoxical tensions, expanding the conventional academic view of seniors as experienced associates. We discuss how audit firm-level tensions revealed through seniors’ experiences offer insights for human capital development and audit quality.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2022-0532

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{emily2026,
  title        = {{“Trying to Get Out from under Water”: Paradox and Power in the Audit Senior Associate Role}},
  author       = {Emily Blum & Kris Hoang},
  journal      = {The Accounting Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2022-0532},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

“Trying to Get Out from under Water”: Paradox and Power in the Audit Senior Associate Role

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.