arbiter
JournalsAccount

Decent and Meaningful Work: Experiences of Immigrant Construction Workers in Portugal

Liliana Faria & Nicole Gonçalves

International Migration2026https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70166article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study explores the experiences of African migrant workers in Portugal's construction sector, focusing on how decent work and meaningful work coexist under structural vulnerability. Guided by the Psychology of Working Theory, semi‐structured interviews with 18 workers were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis. Findings reveal that temporary contracts, low wages, hazardous conditions and limited social protection constrain access to decent work. Despite these challenges, workers actively construct meaningful work through family‐oriented motivations, peer solidarity, and recognition from supervisors. Meaningful work emerges as a relational, situated process, shaped by structural conditions but not reducible to them. Individual and collective resilience sustain dignity, purpose and self‐worth, highlighting the non‐linear relationship between decent work and meaningful work. The results suggest that meaning at work can persist even in precarious contexts, emphasizing the importance of integrated labour policies and organizational practices that foster both decent work and meaningful work, supporting migrant workers' well‐being, agency and long‐term integration.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70166

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{liliana2026,
  title        = {{Decent and Meaningful Work: Experiences of Immigrant Construction Workers in Portugal}},
  author       = {Liliana Faria & Nicole Gonçalves},
  journal      = {International Migration},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70166},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Decent and Meaningful Work: Experiences of Immigrant Construction Workers in Portugal

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.