Client-Attorney Privilege: The Last Barrier to Tax Transparency?

Siddhesh Rao

World Tax Journal2026https://doi.org/10.59403/12j3pscarticle
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Opacity in the global financial system, exacerbated by tax evasion and money laundering, has prompted a shift toward transparency, often intersecting with client-attorney privilege (C-AP). While C-AP is a fundamental cornerstone of the rule of law and the right to privacy, tax authorities increasingly report its misuse to shield non-legal activities and aggressive tax avoidance. This article examines the tension between the public interest in tax transparency and the protection of legal confidentiality. Through comparative analysis of common and civil law jurisdictions and insights from international focus groups, the research identifies patterns of misuse, such as blanket privilege claims and the misrepresentation of commercial advice as legal. It evaluates the impact of mandatory disclosure rules (MDR) and anti-money laundering (AML) regulations on traditional privilege boundaries. Ultimately, the author recommends good practices to prevent abuse while safeguarding genuine legal representation.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/12j3psc

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{siddhesh2026,
  title        = {{Client-Attorney Privilege: The Last Barrier to Tax Transparency?}},
  author       = {Siddhesh Rao},
  journal      = {World Tax Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/12j3psc},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Client-Attorney Privilege: The Last Barrier to Tax Transparency?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.