arbiter
JournalsAccount

Digital Accounting History—Adoption of a Digitalized Historical Research Methodology

Mikhail Kuter et al.

Accounting Historians Journal2025https://doi.org/10.2308/aahj-2025-025article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

This paper presents details and examples of use of a digitalized research methodology adopted to investigate a mid-15th century Venetian double entry ledger. A digitized journal of the ledger was created, populated using the data entered in the ledger, particularly the contra account references recorded in each entry. This enabled missing entries to be generated and accounts only partially surviving, even missing entirely, to be recreated. The digitization process was facilitated by proprietary software developed by the authors, enabling a comprehensive analysis of the merchant’s accounting system. Examples are provided of these activities focusing on the account for profits and losses because the final pages on which it was recorded have not survived, but any account could have been selected. Overall, adoption of a digital methodology greatly increased research productivity, improved clarity and understanding of the double entry accounting system, the business, and its successes and failures. JEL Classifications: M41; N83.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aahj-2025-025

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mikhail2025,
  title        = {{Digital Accounting History—Adoption of a Digitalized Historical Research Methodology}},
  author       = {Mikhail Kuter et al.},
  journal      = {Accounting Historians Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aahj-2025-025},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Digital Accounting History—Adoption of a Digitalized Historical Research Methodology

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.