← Back to results Reducing incentive constraints in bidimensional screening Braulio Calagua
What the paper says This paper studies screening problems with quasilinear preferences, where agents' private information is two-dimensional and the allocation instrument is one-dimensional. We define a preorder to compare types based on their marginal valuation to the instrument, which facilitates the reduction of incentive compatibility constraints that must be checked. With this approach, the discretized problem becomes computationally tractable. As an application, we numerically solve a problem introduced by Lewis & Sappington (1988)
Open paper page → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22574/jmid.2023.12.005 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{braulio2023,
title = {{Reducing incentive constraints in bidimensional screening}},
author = {Braulio Calagua},
journal = {Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design},
year = {2023},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22574/jmid.2023.12.005},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Reducing incentive constraints in bidimensional screening
AU - Calagua, Braulio
JO - Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design
PY - 2023
ER - Braulio Calagua (2023). Reducing incentive constraints in bidimensional screening. *Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22574/jmid.2023.12.005 Braulio Calagua. "Reducing incentive constraints in bidimensional screening." *Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design* (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22574/jmid.2023.12.005. Reducing incentive constraints in bidimensional screening
Braulio Calagua · Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design · 2023
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22574/jmid.2023.12.005 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00 M · momentum 0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.