arbiter
JournalsAccount

Evaluating smart city technology efficiency and citizen satisfaction using data envelopment analysis

Omer Bafail

International Journal of Strategic Property Management2025https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2025.23584article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.46

Abstract

This study employs Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to evaluate the efficiency of the top 20 smart cities in converting Research and Development (R&D) investments into desired outcomes. Using national R&D expenditure (2015–2022) as input and ten criteria from the IMD 2024 Smart City Index report as outputs, the analysis reveals varying levels of efficiency among leading smart cities. Seven cities achieved perfect efficiency scores, while others, including some high-ranking cities, showed unexpected inefficiencies. This study provides valuable insights into resource utilization and identifies specific areas for improvement across structural and technological dimensions. The limitations include the focus on top-performing cities and the use of national R&D data as a proxy for city-specific investments. The findings of this study offer a foundation for policymakers and urban planners to optimize resource allocation and improve smart city initiatives, contributing to the ongoing development of sustainable urban environments in the face of technological advancements and urban challenges.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2025.23584

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{omer2025,
  title        = {{Evaluating smart city technology efficiency and citizen satisfaction using data envelopment analysis}},
  author       = {Omer Bafail},
  journal      = {International Journal of Strategic Property Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2025.23584},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Evaluating smart city technology efficiency and citizen satisfaction using data envelopment analysis

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.