arbiter
JournalsAccount

A market-based rationale for holding corporations accountable for the purpose of societal benefit

David Souder et al.

Long Range Planning2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2026.102609article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Corporations have a different role in market societies than individuals because they are a means to an end. Societies can enforce expectations that corporations create value by requiring that both revenues exceed expenses (profit) and societal benefits exceed societal costs (purpose). The profitability requirement is enforced by markets, while the purpose requirement can be enforced by laws, regulation, and ethical customs. As a result, corporations can, and often do, benefit society. However, not all corporations are equally subject to societal constraints because some corporations achieve a level of autonomy that enables them to subvert the societal constraints that require other firms to deliver net societal benefits. We argue that holding all corporations accountable for this purpose is consistent with the benefits that are understood to derive from markets and competition. By identifying what allows some corporations to resist accountability for purpose, we discuss potential ways to reinforce market mechanisms requiring corporations to achieve societal benefit.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2026.102609

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{david2026,
  title        = {{A market-based rationale for holding corporations accountable for the purpose of societal benefit}},
  author       = {David Souder et al.},
  journal      = {Long Range Planning},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2026.102609},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A market-based rationale for holding corporations accountable for the purpose of societal benefit

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.