arbiter
JournalsAccount

Who “knows better?” epistemic binaries, epistemocides and the risks of (selective) decolonisation in Central Asian narratives

Abel Polese & Тимур Дадабаев

Eurasian Geography and Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2026.2620815article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

No abstract available.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2026.2620815

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{abel2026,
  title        = {{Who “knows better?” epistemic binaries, epistemocides and the risks of (selective) decolonisation in Central Asian narratives}},
  author       = {Abel Polese & Тимур Дадабаев},
  journal      = {Eurasian Geography and Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2026.2620815},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Who “knows better?” epistemic binaries, epistemocides and the risks of (selective) decolonisation in Central Asian narratives

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.