The Effect of Repeated Critical Audit Matter Disclosures on Investors’ Judgments
HUN-TONG TAN & Feng Yeo
What the paper says
Certain audit issues could recur across multiple periods resulting in repeated critical audit matter (CAM) disclosures over time. Although the negative effect of a first-time CAM disclosure on investors’ judgments is well established, little is known about the effect of CAMs when these disclosures are repeated. We experimentally examine the effect of CAM repetition on investors. We predict and find that a repeated CAM disclosure loses its prominence and has a smaller negative effect on investment judgments. Our additional analyses from a within-participants setting suggest that making the CAM repetition salient changes how investors perceive the reasons for the repetition, but does not change the effect of repetition on their investment judgments. JEL Classifications: M41; M42; M48.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.