The End of Chevron Deference: Implications for Courts, Taxpayers, and Policymakers
Mark Jackson & Sonja Pippin
What the paper says
ABSTRACT This paper discusses how the recent Supreme Court case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (Loper Bright), which overturned the four-decade-old doctrine of Chevron deference, affects tax policy, tax legislation, and the interpretation of tax statutes. We start with the history of judicial deference to agency interpretation in tax matters and summarize how Chevron and other landmark cases have impacted tax legislation, the IRS’s interpretation of tax statutes and the Tax Court. In the second part of the paper, we provide an overview of possible outcomes of Loper Bright to the judiciary, the administration, Congress, as well as taxpayers and their advisors. Overall, we expect significant repercussions in the tax world from the Loper Bright decision.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.