Household micro-entrepreneurship and e-commerce as a livelihood resilience strategy
Julien Hanoteau et al.
What the paper says
Purpose In emerging countries, households usually resort to micro-entrepreneurship for their livelihood and to cope with adversity, whereas social distancing measures during pandemics hinder these options. Using the dynamic capabilities framework, we analyze the conditions under which e-commerce enables household micro-entrepreneurship and livelihood resilience in times of adversity. Design/methodology/approach We assume that e-commerce capabilities have enabling and moderating effects on the relationship between distancing measures and micro-entrepreneurship in the food and accommodation sector. The hypotheses are tested in Indonesia, which implemented COVID-19-related social distancing unevenly across administrative districts. This context presents a natural experiment, which we exploit using a difference-in-differences on population survey data. Findings While household micro-entrepreneurship decreased on average across Indonesia, it increased significantly in districts implementing restriction measures, and household e-commerce capabilities further enhanced this effect. This reveals the enabling role of e-commerce adoption for household micro-entrepreneurship and livelihood resilience during adversity in emerging countries, with implications for theory and practice. Originality/value This paper addresses the lack of theoretical and empirical research on the enabling role of digital technologies in micro-entrepreneurial and resilience processes. More specifically, it focuses on households facing adversity in emerging countries, combining digitalization and micro-entrepreneurship to build livelihood resilience strategies.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.