Towards Distributional Ecosystem Accounts

Rufus Panelius

Environmental and Resource Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-026-01070-9article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Natural capital is an important source of wealth and income, but these assets and corresponding benefits of ecosystem services are not necessarily equally distributed within countries. This paper develops a framework to systematically record the distribution of ecosystem service benefits and nature dependencies in the population by integrating the UN system for ecosystem accounting with distributional national accounts, creating distributional ecosystem accounts. I apply the framework to forest ecosystem assets in Finland, combining high-resolution geospatial forest data and micro level income data from administrative registries, linking all privately and publicly owned forests to individuals. To demonstrate how ecosystems contribute to incomes and inequality, four forest-based ecosystem services – timber provisioning, global climate regulation, habitat maintenance, and outdoor recreation – are quantified and the beneficiaries are identified in the income distribution. I then consider the distributional impacts of natural capital depreciation by allocating the social costs of forest harvests to individual households. When applying policy instruments to incentivise socially optimal levels of ecosystem services, taxing degradation tends to come with the additional advantage of progressive incidence. Conversely, subsidising providers of ecosystem services tends to disproportionally favour high-income households.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-026-01070-9

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{rufus2026,
  title        = {{Towards Distributional Ecosystem Accounts}},
  author       = {Rufus Panelius},
  journal      = {Environmental and Resource Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-026-01070-9},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Towards Distributional Ecosystem Accounts

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.