arbiter
JournalsAccount

What's the Holdup? Sustainability Reporting's Uneven Push into Areas of “Old Guard” Traditional Accounting: A Bibliometric Analysis*

Sanobar Siddiqui & S. Leanne Keddie

Accounting Perspectives2025https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12402article
ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Sustainability accounting has encountered strong headwinds while advancing into “old guard” traditional accounting. To understand the status of sustainability accounting with regard to public interest, in this paper we examine the peer‐reviewed accounting literature of the last 10 years using a robust bibliometric approach. Through co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and co‐word analysis, we find that despite the “old guard” headwinds, sustainability accounting has been progressing into traditional accounting. Disciplines that appear to intersect with sustainability accounting include assurance, taxation, marketing, and supply chain management; conversely, disciplines that lag behind include financial and management accounting. Compared to sustainability reporting and corporate social responsibility, environmental, social, and governance is less researched. The journal with the largest number of sustainability accounting articles is Meditari Accountancy Research , while Critical Perspectives on Accounting has garnered the most citations among the journals. Jan Bebbington is the author with the highest citation count. The findings of this bibliometric analysis reveal not only the status of sustainability accounting but also the “big picture” patterns in accounting research.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12402

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sanobar2025,
  title        = {{What's the Holdup? Sustainability Reporting's Uneven Push into Areas of “Old Guard” Traditional Accounting: A Bibliometric Analysis*}},
  author       = {Sanobar Siddiqui & S. Leanne Keddie},
  journal      = {Accounting Perspectives},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12402},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

What's the Holdup? Sustainability Reporting's Uneven Push into Areas of “Old Guard” Traditional Accounting: A Bibliometric Analysis*

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.