A Tale of a Failed Recovery: Ecuador’s Democratic Stagnation

Paolo Moncagatta & Mateo Pazmiño

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science2024https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162241312518article
ABDC B
Weight
0.73

Abstract

Ecuador experienced a dramatic process of democratic backsliding during Rafael Correa’s decade-long administration, which began in 2007. The Correa administration brought plebiscitary overrides and constitutional reengineering that made the government a hyperpresidential one, weakening political institutions and undermining basic civil liberties. When Correa left power in 2017, Ecuador’s democracy recovered; but, even with the promise of an enduring democratic future, the country has not been able to consolidate a functioning representative democratic regime, and new processes of backsliding have occurred. A combination of weak political institutions, poor democratic culture, and major threats to political stability—including the infiltration of organized crime into the political arena—seems to have stagnated Ecuador at the status of a low-quality delegative democracy.

9 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162241312518

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{paolo2024,
  title        = {{A Tale of a Failed Recovery: Ecuador’s Democratic Stagnation}},
  author       = {Paolo Moncagatta & Mateo Pazmiño},
  journal      = {Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162241312518},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Tale of a Failed Recovery: Ecuador’s Democratic Stagnation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.73

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact1.00 × 0.4 = 0.40
M · momentum0.72 × 0.15 = 0.11
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.