arbiter
JournalsAccount

From Pathology to Precision: Transforming Multi‐Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses in International Contracts

Tariq K. Alhasan

Conflict Resolution Quarterly2025https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21473article
ABDC B
Weight
0.56

Abstract

This paper examines the complexities of drafting effective multi‐tiered dispute resolution clauses (MTDRCs) in international contracts, emphasizing that a structured sequence of dispute resolution methods is a central mechanism for enhancing efficiency and predictability. Key elements like legal compliance, objective criteria, and consistency with contract terms are crucial in ensuring that each stage—from negotiation to arbitration—functions seamlessly. The analysis highlights the risks of poorly drafted, pathological clauses, which can undermine arbitration's effectiveness, leading to delays and increased costs. Through legal precedents and case studies, the paper distinguishes between admissibility and jurisdictional challenges, offering practical strategies for drafting robust MTDRCs. It explores the role of emerging technologies, such as blockchain, in enhancing transparency. This guidance is particularly valuable for legal practitioners seeking to improve dispute resolution outcomes in international commercial transactions. Ultimately, the study contributes to broader goals like SDG 16 and SDG 9, promoting effective and equitable dispute resolution.

10 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21473

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tariq2025,
  title        = {{From Pathology to Precision: Transforming Multi‐Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses in International Contracts}},
  author       = {Tariq K. Alhasan},
  journal      = {Conflict Resolution Quarterly},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21473},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

From Pathology to Precision: Transforming Multi‐Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses in International Contracts

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.56

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.55 × 0.4 = 0.22
M · momentum0.75 × 0.15 = 0.11
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.