How perceptions of time and place construct two stories concerning status and privilege for clinicians and administrators in healthcare organizations

Ingrid Svensson & Thomas Andersson

Journal of Professions and Organization2025https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaf002article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

This paper describes and explains how different stories for clinicians and administrators are constructed and how they influence occupational practices in healthcare organizations. To do that, we employed an analytical frame based on research that underscores the role of temporality and placing for organizing processes and professional relations. The enactments and constructions shown in the data carry consequences for behaviours and relations in practice, resulting in two parallel stories being present simultaneously. The stories tell how administrators and clinicians, respectively, are those with prerequisites that can be summarized as being privileged or undervalued. As these stories are in parallel, it becomes impossible for them to meet and converge, meaning that professional knowledge and initiative may be not sufficiently utilized, for both groups.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaf002

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ingrid2025,
  title        = {{How perceptions of time and place construct two stories concerning status and privilege for clinicians and administrators in healthcare organizations}},
  author       = {Ingrid Svensson & Thomas Andersson},
  journal      = {Journal of Professions and Organization},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaf002},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How perceptions of time and place construct two stories concerning status and privilege for clinicians and administrators in healthcare organizations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.