← Back to results Double Marginalization with Cournot Oligopolies Timothy J. Tardiff
Abstract The elimination of double marginalization has been an important consideration in recent updates to the U.S. Horizontal and Vertical Merger Guidelines, in particular, and the evaluation of whether vertical mergers are pro- or anticompetitive, in general. This article extends frameworks for analyzing the effects of eliminating double marginalization on prices from situations with upstream and downstream monopolies to encompass Cournot oligopolies both upstream and downstream.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603x251390755 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{timothy2025,
title = {{Double Marginalization with Cournot Oligopolies}},
author = {Timothy J. Tardiff},
journal = {Antitrust Bulletin},
year = {2025},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603x251390755},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Double Marginalization with Cournot Oligopolies
AU - Tardiff, Timothy J.
JO - Antitrust Bulletin
PY - 2025
ER - Timothy J. Tardiff (2025). Double Marginalization with Cournot Oligopolies. *Antitrust Bulletin*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603x251390755 Timothy J. Tardiff. "Double Marginalization with Cournot Oligopolies." *Antitrust Bulletin* (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603x251390755. Double Marginalization with Cournot Oligopolies
Timothy J. Tardiff · Antitrust Bulletin · 2025
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603x251390755 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.