Reforms or deforms? The rise and decline of the rentier middle class in the United Arab Emirates

Mira Al Hussein

Asian and Pacific Migration Journal2025https://doi.org/10.1177/01171968251331233article
ABDC C
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

This article examines the dual bargains of the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) government that are vital to its political stability. Using interviews with middle-class Emiratis as well as publicly available primary and secondary sources, I shed light on how these Emiratis perceive the changes that these bargains have undergone. Oil wealth fueled the emergence of a new, educated middle class that came to occupy public sector jobs, buffeted by the Kafala system. Due to recent policy shifts, citizens now report anxieties owing to a decline in material government benefits, a push out of secure public sector employment into precarious private sector jobs and the termination of “ Arbab entrepreneurship.” At the same time, the government is seen to cater more to noncitizens, resulting in a diminishing citizen or noncitizen differential, going so far as to elicit fear of a reversal of roles. As a result, the discourse on labor reforms and economic growth does not connote positive change for Emiratis.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01171968251331233

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mira2025,
  title        = {{Reforms or deforms? The rise and decline of the rentier middle class in the United Arab Emirates}},
  author       = {Mira Al Hussein},
  journal      = {Asian and Pacific Migration Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01171968251331233},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Reforms or deforms? The rise and decline of the rentier middle class in the United Arab Emirates

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.