arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

L'evoluzione e il ruolo dei sistemi di controllo diagnostico nel contesto "agile"

Bruno De Rosa

Management Control2026https://doi.org/10.3280/maco2025-003008article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The adoption of logics aimed at fostering organizational agility has profoundly changed the structure of traditional managerial models. This implies the need to revise control systems in a direction aimed at making "radical decentralization" (O'Grady, 2019) choices effective and fostering the emotional involvement of employees. The role played by measurement systems has always been particularly important, so it should come as no surprise that there have been significant evolutions in these forms of control. In agile companies, measurement plays an important role in nurturing interactive control mechanisms so as to capture the whole breadth of strategic uncertainties» (Tuomela, 2005). However, proper development of goal-setting processes and effective operation of diagnostic control systems maintain an important role in these contexts as well. These systems must clearly move in the same direction in which the overall control system evolves and thus take on a new physiognomy compatible with the new information and control requirements. In this contribution one of the possible evolutionary forms represented by the «collaborative goal-setting protocol» (Doerr, 2018) called OKR is analyzed.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3280/maco2025-003008

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{bruno2026,
  title        = {{L'evoluzione e il ruolo dei sistemi di controllo diagnostico nel contesto "agile"}},
  author       = {Bruno De Rosa},
  journal      = {Management Control},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3280/maco2025-003008},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

L'evoluzione e il ruolo dei sistemi di controllo diagnostico nel contesto "agile"

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.