Shared clinical governance arrangements between NHS and independent acute hospitals in England: Findings from a national survey of senior leaders

Gemma Stringer et al.

Journal of Health Services Research and Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196261431315article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

ObjectivesTo present the findings from a national survey of senior leaders in NHS and independent hospitals in England concerning the effectiveness of shared arrangements for clinical governance. To provide a comprehensive overview of shared arrangements for the oversight of consultants' practice, processes for appraisal and revalidation, and the management of significant concerns. The results from this study will improve understanding of the practical functioning of clinical governance processes at the interface between the NHS and the independent sector.MethodsBetween December 2023 and April 2024, an online survey was distributed to senior leads with governance responsibilities in NHS and independent hospitals in England.Results320 responses were received (response rate 42%), 235 from individuals working in NHS trusts (response rate 40%) and 85 from individuals in independent hospitals (response rate 48%). Respondents reported that some clinical governance arrangements are established across both sectors, with some relationships characterised as positive and relatively strong. However, relationships often depended on goodwill, personal connections, and consultant probity, rather than the systematic implementation of recommended processes. Respondents expressed concerns regarding the non-mandatory and unregulated nature of processes for sharing concerns, believing this led to insufficient resources and challenges in verifying information. They called for improved data quality, better communication and information sharing and more robust and formalised processes.ConclusionsShared clinical governance arrangements between the NHS and independent sectors are in place in some but not all of the organisations where respondents' consultants worked. This raises concerns about progress towards implementing the Paterson inquiry recommendations, including access to consultants' whole practice information and sharing concerns about consultants working across different providers. The findings may also hold relevance for international audiences where medical staff work across multiple healthcare providers. Further empirical research is needed to compare clinical governance arrangements between the NHS and independent sectors, and suggest how shared clinical governance can be organised to assure the quality and safety of care.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196261431315

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{gemma2026,
  title        = {{Shared clinical governance arrangements between NHS and independent acute hospitals in England: Findings from a national survey of senior leaders}},
  author       = {Gemma Stringer et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Health Services Research and Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196261431315},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Shared clinical governance arrangements between NHS and independent acute hospitals in England: Findings from a national survey of senior leaders

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.