Privacy Paradox: The Roles of Online Shopping Habits and Regulatory Foci in Bridging the Intention–Behavior Gap

Meysam Moayery & Sigitas Urbonavičius

Journal of Interactive Marketing2025https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968251320609article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.48

Abstract

This research approaches the intention–behavior gap within the context of the privacy paradox from a novel perspective, focusing on the moderating roles of online shopping habits and regulatory foci in the relationship between disclosure intention and actual disclosure behavior. The two distinct studies reveal that both factors significantly contribute to shaping this gap (Study 1) and provide further insights into the processes underlying the identified effects (Study 2). Specifically, the data suggest that online shopping habits and regulatory foci influence the extent to which individuals translate their disclosure intentions into actual information disclosure behavior. By examining these moderating variables in depth, this article contributes to the domain of consumer privacy by offering a novel interpretation of the reasons behind the privacy paradox. Based on this, practical implications and recommendations for future studies are provided.

5 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968251320609

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{meysam2025,
  title        = {{Privacy Paradox: The Roles of Online Shopping Habits and Regulatory Foci in Bridging the Intention–Behavior Gap}},
  author       = {Meysam Moayery & Sigitas Urbonavičius},
  journal      = {Journal of Interactive Marketing},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968251320609},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Privacy Paradox: The Roles of Online Shopping Habits and Regulatory Foci in Bridging the Intention–Behavior Gap

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.48

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.41 × 0.4 = 0.16
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.