arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

IDIOSYNCRATIC SHOCKS AND MACROECONOMIC VOLATILITY: A PRIMER ON GRANULAR ANALYSIS

Qian Cao & Bing Ma

Singapore Economic Review2026https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217590826500013article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This paper investigates how firm-level idiosyncratic shocks, when combined with fat-tailed firm size distributions, influence macroeconomic fluctuations and monetary policy. By developing a Calvo-type granular DSGE model calibrated to the Chinese economy, we show both mathematically and numerically that idiosyncratic productivity shocks can significantly raise the volatility of output. Simulations reveal that economies with granular firm structures also require more aggressive monetary policies to stabilize the economy. By calibrating the model to the US economy, our model also exhibits superior power in explaining inflation, offering a potential solution to the reset price inflation puzzle. These findings underscore the macroeconomic relevance of firm-level heterogeneity and suggest that accounting for granularity is essential for accurate modeling and effective policy design, especially in economies with fat-tailed firm size distributions.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217590826500013

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{qian2026,
  title        = {{IDIOSYNCRATIC SHOCKS AND MACROECONOMIC VOLATILITY: A PRIMER ON GRANULAR ANALYSIS}},
  author       = {Qian Cao & Bing Ma},
  journal      = {Singapore Economic Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217590826500013},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

IDIOSYNCRATIC SHOCKS AND MACROECONOMIC VOLATILITY: A PRIMER ON GRANULAR ANALYSIS

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.