National Affluence Strengthens the Positive Association Between Perceived Social Mobility and Subjective-Well-Being

W. K. Cheng Hin Ng

The Journal of Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2026.2630170article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Previous research has demonstrated that perceived social mobility increases, whereas income inequality decreases, subjective well-being (SWB). Using the World Values Survey (Wave 7) data, this study examined whether national affluence moderated the effects of perceived social mobility and attitude toward income equality on individual SWB (life satisfaction and global happiness). Hierarchical linear modeling found that people who perceived greater social mobility, and those who valued incentivizing individual effort (over income equality), reported higher SWB. Moreover, national affluence moderated the effects of perceived mobility. The positive impact of perceived mobility on SWB was amplified in richer than poorer countries. The findings suggest that policies seeking to enhance well-being should focus not only on objective economic conditions but also people's perceptions of inequality and social status. For instance, policies that bolster perceptions of social mobility (e.g., providing low-cost quality education or housing for all) could enhance SWB, but more so in wealthier countries.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2026.2630170

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{w.2026,
  title        = {{National Affluence Strengthens the Positive Association Between Perceived Social Mobility and Subjective-Well-Being}},
  author       = {W. K. Cheng Hin Ng},
  journal      = {The Journal of Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2026.2630170},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

National Affluence Strengthens the Positive Association Between Perceived Social Mobility and Subjective-Well-Being

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.