Living the Luxury Lie: How Luxury Tourism Triggers Imposter Syndrome and Drives Negative Emotions and Authenticity-Seeking

Ben Marder et al.

Journal of Travel Research2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875261424437article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Luxury tourism is known for projecting status and prestige, largely considered a positive outcome for tourists. However, a dark side may emerge in the form of imposter syndrome, especially for aspiring luxury tourists. This research is the first tourism study examining status-related imposter thoughts (beliefs that others overestimate one’s status) and their emotional and behavioural consequences. Through four experiments across different luxury tourism settings, we find that luxury experiences trigger imposter thoughts, which link to increased authenticity-seeking, anxiety, and dejection. Effects diminish when tourists possess prior similar experiences or perceive preferential treatment as deserved. Additionally, the absence of other tourists reduces imposter-driven anxiety, while their presence amplifies it. Our contributions lie in establishing imposter thoughts as an overlooked but consequential cognition in luxury tourism for tourists, and in guiding managers toward tackling their effects through authenticity provision and practices that ensure luxury is perceived as deserved.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875261424437

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ben2026,
  title        = {{Living the Luxury Lie: How Luxury Tourism Triggers Imposter Syndrome and Drives Negative Emotions and Authenticity-Seeking}},
  author       = {Ben Marder et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Travel Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875261424437},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Living the Luxury Lie: How Luxury Tourism Triggers Imposter Syndrome and Drives Negative Emotions and Authenticity-Seeking

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.