arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Making Sense of Lohia’s Omission from Anti-caste Discourses in India

P. Dharani Kumar

Studies in Indian Politics2026https://doi.org/10.1177/23210230261429674article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Rammanohar Lohia (1910–1967) is one of the rare thinkers who made caste central to Indian politics in the early years of independence. Yet when compared to figures like Ambedkar, Phule or Periyar in the same tradition, Lohia stands nowhere in terms of academic reception. The question is, why? This article attempts to offer a comprehensive understanding of Lohia’s omission from anti-caste discourses and the alleged lack of radical anti-caste movements in Northern India. It challenges the prevailing omission of Lohia from anti-caste discourses, arguing that he holds a significant position as an anti-caste thinker within the Hindi public sphere. By delving into Lohia’s relationship with Ambedkar and Periyar, the article claims that the dominant template of rejecting Hinduism as the core criterion for being anti-caste has foreclosed the possibility of appreciating Lohia’s anti-caste thoughts. It claims that even the Dalit politics of present times is closer to Lohia than to Ambedkar.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23210230261429674

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{p.2026,
  title        = {{Making Sense of Lohia’s Omission from Anti-caste Discourses in India}},
  author       = {P. Dharani Kumar},
  journal      = {Studies in Indian Politics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23210230261429674},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Making Sense of Lohia’s Omission from Anti-caste Discourses in India

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.