Online Mediation Participant Experience at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission – Do the Data Herald the Creative Destruction of In-Person Dispute Resolution?

E. Patrick McDermott & Ruth Obar

Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations2023https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-618620230000027006book-chapter
AJG 1
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

The pandemic forced the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to transition to online video mediation (OVM) in place of its existing in-person mediation (IPM) model. Using measurements from their 2000 evaluation of EEOC IPM, plus new measures related to the elements of OVM, the authors surveyed 2,387 EEOC mediation participants during the pandemic, obtaining responses from 1,234 (53%). OVM performed as well or better on the four measures of procedural fairness, overall mediation fairness, satisfaction with the results, and willingness to use the process again. Sixty-seven percent of the parties favored OVM over IPM. Responses to a closed-end survey that provided for additional open-end responses indicate that OVM is seen by the parties as having a more convenient location, lower costs, and greater flexibility. The results establish that OVM provides greater access to justice due to safe space and to the willingness of additional employers to engage in OVM.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-618620230000027006

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{e.2023,
  title        = {{Online Mediation Participant Experience at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission – Do the Data Herald the Creative Destruction of In-Person Dispute Resolution?}},
  author       = {E. Patrick McDermott & Ruth Obar},
  journal      = {Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-618620230000027006},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Online Mediation Participant Experience at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission – Do the Data Herald the Creative Destruction of In-Person Dispute Resolution?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.