arbiter
JournalsAccount

The lexical boost in structural priming: The syntactic head matters but adjacency does not.

Roger P. G. van Gompel et al.

Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, memory, and cognition2026https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001599article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Evidence for head-centered models of structural priming (e.g., Pickering & Branigan, 1998) comes from studies showing that structural priming is stronger when the head of the primed structure is repeated between prime and target than when it is not (the lexical boost effect), whereas the repetition of nonhead words does not affect structural priming (e.g., Carminati et al., 2019). However, the different effects of head and nonhead words might have been due to their different position in the sentence. For example, the head verb immediately preceded the primed structure in ditransitive sentences (the lawyer handed the celebrity the present/the present to the celebrity), whereas the nonhead subject did not. In the present study, we used prime and target sentences where the order of the head (verb) and nonhead (subject) was reversed compared with previous studies. Despite this, repetition of the head verb resulted in a lexical boost, but repetition of the nonhead subject did not. This supports head-centered structural priming models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001599

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{roger2026,
  title        = {{The lexical boost in structural priming: The syntactic head matters but adjacency does not.}},
  author       = {Roger P. G. van Gompel et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, memory, and cognition},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001599},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The lexical boost in structural priming: The syntactic head matters but adjacency does not.

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.