arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Business strategy, enterprise risk management, organisational innovation performance and organisational performance: comparing fsQCA with PLS-SEM

Nguyen Vinh Khuong et al.

International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics2025https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbge.2025.146331article
AJG 2
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

The purpose of this research is to clarify the relationship between business strategy (BS), enterprise risk management (ERM), organisational innovation performance (OIP), and organisational performance (OP) in Vietnam. We also compare the PLS-SEM findings to a recently developed panel data fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis technique (fsQCA). According to the findings, the BS factor has a substantial impact on OP. The ERM factor mediates the relationship between BS and OP along with the relationship between BS and OIP. In the link between BS and OP, as well as the relationship between ERM and OP, the OIP factor serves as an intermediate. This work adds to the scientific literature by providing empirical evidence with a deeper understanding of the level of influence and importance of using a combination of BS and risk management implementation to improve OP in the market.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbge.2025.146331

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nguyen2025,
  title        = {{Business strategy, enterprise risk management, organisational innovation performance and organisational performance: comparing fsQCA with PLS-SEM}},
  author       = {Nguyen Vinh Khuong et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbge.2025.146331},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Business strategy, enterprise risk management, organisational innovation performance and organisational performance: comparing fsQCA with PLS-SEM

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.