← Back to results The museum pass problem with consortia Juan Carlos Gonçalves-Dosantos et al.
Abstract In this paper, we extend the museum pass problem to incorporate the market structure. To be more precise, we consider that museums are organized into several pass programs or consortia. Within this framework, we propose four allocation mechanisms based on the market structure and the principles of proportionality and egalitarianism. Each mechanism satisfies a distinct set of reasonable properties related to fairness and stability, which serve to axiomatically characterize them.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-026-00989-z Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{juan2026,
title = {{The museum pass problem with consortia}},
author = {Juan Carlos Gonçalves-Dosantos et al.},
journal = {International Journal of Game Theory},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-026-00989-z},
} TY - JOUR
TI - The museum pass problem with consortia
AU - al., Juan Carlos Gonçalves-Dosantos et
JO - International Journal of Game Theory
PY - 2026
ER - Juan Carlos Gonçalves-Dosantos et al. (2026). The museum pass problem with consortia. *International Journal of Game Theory*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-026-00989-z Juan Carlos Gonçalves-Dosantos et al.. "The museum pass problem with consortia." *International Journal of Game Theory* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-026-00989-z. The museum pass problem with consortia
Juan Carlos Gonçalves-Dosantos et al. · International Journal of Game Theory · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-026-00989-z Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.