Addressing Barriers to Participatory Budgeting in a Higher Education Context

Brian M. Burnett & Peter A. Jones

Public Finance and Management2025https://doi.org/10.1177/15239721251367755article
ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Participation in public budgeting has long been recognized as a means to enhance transparency, improve performance, and build trust in governance. However, significant barriers such as the complexity of financial information can limit meaningful engagement. This paper addresses these challenges by introducing a “Color of Money” taxonomy designed to simplify budgetary concepts and foster informed decision making. In addition, we describe the implementation of a workshop-based initiative—called a “finance academy”—which was created by the finance leadership of a research-intensive public university. With the goal of fostering collaboration and trust, the finance academy aimed to educate senior leaders and fiscal staff on key budgetary issues faced by the university. While these efforts are especially timely given the mounting fiscal pressures facing higher education, they are more broadly applicable to public and nonprofit organizations of various sizes and complexities. Ultimately, we argue that demystifying financial processes and investing in the education of various institutional actors can enhance transparency, build institutional trust, and support long-term financial sustainability.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15239721251367755

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{brian2025,
  title        = {{Addressing Barriers to Participatory Budgeting in a Higher Education Context}},
  author       = {Brian M. Burnett & Peter A. Jones},
  journal      = {Public Finance and Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15239721251367755},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Addressing Barriers to Participatory Budgeting in a Higher Education Context

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.