Whistleblowing and Internal Communication

Lin Nan & Ronghuo Zheng

The Accounting Review2026https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2024-0036article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We investigate how incentives provided by whistleblowing programs affect the likelihood of whistleblowing, firm value, and social welfare in the presence of endogenous internal communication. Specifically, we focus on a myopic manager’s ex post decision on internal communication with the employee. An informed employee plays a dual role: working to fix the defect internally or acting as a whistleblower to expose the misconduct if the manager withholds defect information from the public. We find that, when the whistleblowing reward is relatively small, providing stronger incentives increases the likelihood of whistleblowing and can help improve firm value and social welfare. However, once rewards become excessively large and compromise internal communication, contrary to conventional wisdom, the likelihood of whistleblowing declines and both firm value and social welfare decline too. We also characterize the optimal whistleblowing rewards designed by strategic regulators seeking to maximize firm value or social welfare. JEL Classifications: D83; G30; G34; M40.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2024-0036

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lin2026,
  title        = {{Whistleblowing and Internal Communication}},
  author       = {Lin Nan & Ronghuo Zheng},
  journal      = {The Accounting Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2024-0036},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Whistleblowing and Internal Communication

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.