Fundraising as Contracting: Why Nonprofits Accept In‐Kind Donations

Elizabeth A. M. Searing et al.

Nonprofit Management and Leadership2026https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.70043article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

ABSTRACT In‐kind (nonmonetary) donations are a popular form of philanthropy that have received much less scholarly attention than monetary gifts. This study documents the prevalence of types of in‐kind giving and associated organizational practices, then explores links between the perceptions of nonprofit managers, organizational practices, and prevalence of in‐kind gifts. Using phone survey data, we conduct a mixed‐method cross‐sectional analysis of 240 US nonprofit organizations. Findings indicate a wide variety of in‐kind donations and ways in which they are solicited. Charity managers ascribe a variety of motivations to donors for giving in‐kind, with more offering positive reasons (such as donors believing such donations are useful) than negative reasons (such as donor convenience). Using theoretical insights from contracting as a guide, we find that practices regarding in‐kind donations stem from monetary and nonmonetary (such as time or usefulness) considerations, though with differing effects depending on whether there are perceived challenges or opportunities.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.70043

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{elizabeth2026,
  title        = {{Fundraising as Contracting: Why Nonprofits Accept In‐Kind Donations}},
  author       = {Elizabeth A. M. Searing et al.},
  journal      = {Nonprofit Management and Leadership},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.70043},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Fundraising as Contracting: Why Nonprofits Accept In‐Kind Donations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.