Varieties of engagement: exploring the micro-practices of managers in employing disadvantaged jobseekers

Siri Yde Aksnes & Eric Breit

Journal of Social Policy2025https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279425000030article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.44

Abstract

Despite the increased emphasis on ‘employer engagement’ to take advantage of demand-side active labour market policies, little attention has been paid to managers. In this paper, we examine the micro-practices of engaged managers in including jobseekers from disadvantaged groups. Through a qualitative study of managers, jobseekers and other stakeholders in twenty-one companies with a history of employing disadvantaged jobseekers, we identify three broad types of engagement by managers: vacancy-oriented, ability-oriented, and growth-oriented. The types of engagement involve crucial differences in motivation, caring and accommodation on the part of the employing managers. Our findings highlight the multi-facetedness of employer engagement when examined from the perspective of managers and propose ‘inclusive leadership’ as a useful lens to understand engaged employers.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279425000030

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{siri2025,
  title        = {{Varieties of engagement: exploring the micro-practices of managers in employing disadvantaged jobseekers}},
  author       = {Siri Yde Aksnes & Eric Breit},
  journal      = {Journal of Social Policy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279425000030},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Varieties of engagement: exploring the micro-practices of managers in employing disadvantaged jobseekers

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.