arbiter
JournalsAccount

Leveraging AI for Predictive Analytics With Survey-Based Rubrics in the Public Service Sector in Canada and the USA

Kamel Rouibah et al.

Journal of Global Information Management2026https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.401113article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In developed countries, a significant gap persists in the absence of empirical, survey-based rubrics to measure AI's technical characteristics and predictive analytics in the public service sector. This study fills this gap by developing and validating survey-based rubrics through a comparison between Canada and the United States (US). Following MacKenzie, Shiau, and Huang's scale development procedures, this research utilized data from Canadian and US government AI websites twice, employing structural equation modeling (SEM) and PLS methods to examine the scale properties and test the relationships between AI's technical characteristics and predictive analytics. Findings show that supervised and unsupervised machine learning, along with deep learning, are positively associated with predictive analytics across public service sectors in both countries. Conversely, artificial neural networks are not positively associated with predictive analytics in Canada, whereas they are in the US. The relationship between artificial neural networks and predictive analytics varies across countries.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.401113

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kamel2026,
  title        = {{Leveraging AI for Predictive Analytics With Survey-Based Rubrics in the Public Service Sector in Canada and the USA}},
  author       = {Kamel Rouibah et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Global Information Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.401113},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Leveraging AI for Predictive Analytics With Survey-Based Rubrics in the Public Service Sector in Canada and the USA

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.