Personal Worldview Conviction Is a Missing Piece in Financial Well‐Being

Shane Enete & Eu Gene Chin

Financial Planning Review2025https://doi.org/10.1002/cfp2.70001article
ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel and potentially essential financial well‐being variable—worldview conviction—for financial professionals, researchers, and policymakers to more accurately predict an individual's financial well‐being. Using the results from a sample of 492 participants, this paper finds evidence that having convictions about how life works (i.e., personal worldview) predicts financial well‐being indirectly through an individual's aspirational life goals (i.e., values). More specifically, evidence was found that higher levels of conviction in a personal worldview predicted more intrinsic values. Intrinsic value types (goals related to personal growth, deeper relationships, or community contribution) were found to be associated with higher financial well‐being, while extrinsic value types (goals related to acquiring wealth, fame, or image) were found to be associated with lower financial well‐being.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cfp2.70001

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shane2025,
  title        = {{Personal Worldview Conviction Is a Missing Piece in Financial Well‐Being}},
  author       = {Shane Enete & Eu Gene Chin},
  journal      = {Financial Planning Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cfp2.70001},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Personal Worldview Conviction Is a Missing Piece in Financial Well‐Being

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.