arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

A novel task for measuring numerical bias among adults

Shachar Hochman et al.

Cognition2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106439article
AJG 4
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Numerical bias is the spontaneous tendency to base decisions on numerical rather than equally available non-numerical information. We introduce the Congruent Learning-Incongruent Probe (CLIP) task, a computerised paradigm for indexing numerical bias in adults. The task presents digit pairs that vary in numerical value and physical size, organised into blocks. In feedback-based learning trials, digits are congruent (larger number in larger font) and participants learn which stimulus is "correct" for that block. In subsequent no-feedback probe trials (test trials), the same pairs are presented incongruently, revealing whether choices are spontaneously driven by numerical or physical dimensions. A sample of 129 adults completed a multi-day battery to validate the CLIP task. Drift-diffusion modelling indicated substantial individual differences in numerical bias. Higher numerical bias correlated positively with maths fluency and quantitative reasoning, paralleling child findings on spontaneous focus on numerosity (SFON) and maths competence. To establish convergent validity, we also administered a numerical Stroop task that requires suppressing numerical information; individuals with stronger numerical bias showed larger interference and facilitation effects. These findings validate the CLIP task as a reliable measure of numerical bias and, more broadly, highlight how variability in spontaneous numerical processing shapes cognitive-control demands, illuminating the interplay between domain-specific biases and executive function.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106439

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shachar2026,
  title        = {{A novel task for measuring numerical bias among adults}},
  author       = {Shachar Hochman et al.},
  journal      = {Cognition},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106439},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A novel task for measuring numerical bias among adults

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.