A Simple Method for Predicting Covariance Matrices of Financial Returns

Kasper Johansson et al.

Foundations and Trends in Econometrics2023https://doi.org/10.1561/0800000047article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.66

What the paper says

We consider the well-studied problem of predicting the time-varying covariance matrix of a vector of financial returns. Popular methods range from simple predictors like rolling window or exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) to more sophisticated predictors such as generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (GARCH) type methods. Building on a specific covariance estimator suggested by Engle in 2002, we propose a relatively simple extension that requires little or no tuning or fitting, is interpretable, and produces results at least as good as MGARCH, a popular extension of GARCH that handles multiple assets. To evaluate predictors we introduce a novel approach, evaluating the regret of the log-likelihood over a time period such as a quarter. This metric allows us to see not only how well a covariance predictor does overall, but also how quickly it reacts to changes in market conditions. Our simple predictor outperforms MGARCH in terms of regret. We also test covariance predictors on downstream applications such as portfolio optimization methods that depend on the covariance matrix. For these applications our simple covariance predictor and MGARCH perform similarly.

11 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/0800000047

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kasper2023,
  title        = {{A Simple Method for Predicting Covariance Matrices of Financial Returns}},
  author       = {Kasper Johansson et al.},
  journal      = {Foundations and Trends in Econometrics},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/0800000047},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Simple Method for Predicting Covariance Matrices of Financial Returns

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.66

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.79 × 0.4 = 0.32
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.