arbiter
JournalsAccount

Productive labour, technological development and the collapse of value

Ingrid Hanon

Capital and Class2026https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168261423828article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Marx’s speculative reflections in the Grundrisse have inspired various interpretations concerning crisis and the potential end of the capitalist system. Among the more radical theses is the one put forward by Robert Kurz and others in the Marxist Wertkritik tradition. This article critically revisits the core assumptions underpinning the Wertkritik argument that capitalism is heading towards imminent collapse – an immanent contradiction triggered by the microelectronic revolution of the 1970s, which resulted in the (irreversible) crisis of abstract labour. While acknowledging capitalism’s crisis-prone nature, this article questions the more fundamental premises of the Wertkritik collapse thesis, scrutinises the assumption of a linear trajectory towards full automation of the production process and the consequent disappearance of all labour-intensive activities, and offers a more nuanced interpretation of the role attributed to relative surplus value in shaping technology-driven capitalist development. The analysis thus centres on the Wertkritik tradition, particularly the work of Kurz, providing a reassessment of the concept of productive labour advanced by this tradition and the dynamics of capitalist-driven technological development.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168261423828

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ingrid2026,
  title        = {{Productive labour, technological development and the collapse of value}},
  author       = {Ingrid Hanon},
  journal      = {Capital and Class},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168261423828},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Productive labour, technological development and the collapse of value

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.