arbiter
JournalsAccount

A metric-conjoint experiment on crowd lenders’ responses to failure attributions of entrepreneurs

Caroline Lindlar et al.

International Small Business Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426261420696article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Crowdlending offers entrepreneurs and lenders a low-barrier alternative to traditional finance but operates under high uncertainty and limited firm-level information, requiring reliance on observable cues. One crucial cue arises when entrepreneurs disclose and explain prior failure. Drawing on attribution theory, we examine how crowd lenders respond to different failure attributions and how this shapes willingness to invest. Using a metric-conjoint experiment in Germany ( N = 78; 2496 observations) and analysing results with linear mixed-effects models, we find that lenders react more positively to internal, controllable, and unstable attributions compared to external, stable, and uncontrollable causes. Moreover, gender differences emerged, with female lenders responding differently from men. By shifting the focus from the self-responses by entrepreneurs to lender evaluations, we extend attribution theory to the crowdlending context and demonstrate how gender shapes the interpretation of failure signals. These insights advance understanding of decision-making in alternative entrepreneurial finance, informing entrepreneurs, lenders, and platform design.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426261420696

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{caroline2026,
  title        = {{A metric-conjoint experiment on crowd lenders’ responses to failure attributions of entrepreneurs}},
  author       = {Caroline Lindlar et al.},
  journal      = {International Small Business Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426261420696},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A metric-conjoint experiment on crowd lenders’ responses to failure attributions of entrepreneurs

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.